We Solved the How to Code Problem. We Still Haven't Solved 'What to Build.'

The rise of AI-powered coding tools has significantly reduced the friction between an idea and a functional prototype. While developers can now generate code, tests, and APIs in hours, the author argues that this ease of implementation creates a new challenge: the tendency to build unnecessary software. When the cost of building is low, the risk of creating features that lack real-world utility increases. The article suggests that productivity should no longer be defined by the volume of code produced, but by the ability to make sound judgments about what actually deserves to be built. The author proposes five questions to evaluate project viability, emphasizing that as implementation becomes cheaper, the value of strategic decision-making and problem-framing grows. Ultimately, the challenge for modern developers is shifting from mastering the 'how' of coding to mastering the 'why' of product development.
This is a summary. Read the full article at the original source:
Dev.toRelated stories
Redis in .NET Routes: Cache, Pub/Sub, Streams with Groups, and Claim Check in a Single Connector
The article introduces the new redb.Route.Redis connector for the .NET platform, which integrates Redis operations into a unified routing architecture…
In this article, Joel David Hamkins explores the mathematical challenge of finding the largest possible number that can be expressed within the 280-ch…
How do you stop an LLM from leaking API keys in the code it writes? Default to secret
Pierre-Laurent Médori from GoodBarber shares a strategy to prevent LLMs from accidentally leaking API keys in generated code. Instead of relying on pa…



