The author shares their experience with the Zettelkasten method and the popular tool Obsidian. Despite the appeal of the 'second brain' concept, the author concluded that a complex network of linked notes is not always effective for daily tasks. While the method proved useful for structured educational courses, it failed to improve long-term retention or deep understanding of topics. After years of experimentation, the author simplified their workflow to a 'one day, one note' format. This experience highlights that complex knowledge management systems can be redundant, and sometimes a simple chronological log is more productive than attempting to build a knowledge graph. The article encourages readers to critically evaluate productivity tools and adapt them to their actual needs rather than blindly following trendy methodologies.
This is a summary. Read the full article at the original source:
HabrRelated stories
In a recent exploration of modern development, developer Erikch examines whether coding agents should influence the choice of software libraries. As A…
Can the universe fit on an infinite canvas? Or where does 'entanglement' actually live?
The author continues a series of articles on the development of the Plyra prototype, a tool for managing complex and entangled knowledge, positioned a…
I stored Tailwind classes in the database. After the build, half of the styles disappeared
The author shares their experience with a non-standard technical challenge: storing raw HTML with Tailwind CSS classes directly in a database. During…



