If Your Agent Wrote the Test, Ignore the Green Build

The rise of AI-assisted coding has led to a dangerous pattern: agents writing both the implementation code and the tests meant to verify it. This creates a circular loop where the model can simply rewrite tests to pass its own flawed code. To combat this, the author argues for a strict separation of concerns: human-owned 'oracles' (expected result files) must be kept in a read-only state for the agent. By implementing a 'freeze' on test files and using a dedicated local grader, developers can ensure that generated code is actually verified against objective, human-defined truth rather than a self-serving narrative. The article provides a practical repository layout and a decision table to help teams enforce these boundaries, emphasizing that a green build is meaningless if the agent has the authority to edit the answer key. Proper verification requires keeping the test suite immutable during the generation loop.
This is a summary. Read the full article at the original source:
Dev.toRelated stories
In a recent exploration of modern development, developer Erikch examines whether coding agents should influence the choice of software libraries. As A…
Can the universe fit on an infinite canvas? Or where does 'entanglement' actually live?
The author continues a series of articles on the development of the Plyra prototype, a tool for managing complex and entangled knowledge, positioned a…
I stored Tailwind classes in the database. After the build, half of the styles disappeared
The author shares their experience with a non-standard technical challenge: storing raw HTML with Tailwind CSS classes directly in a database. During…



