‘ChatGPT will glaze anyone regardless’: I tried 5 ways to make ChatGPT flatter and agree with me — here’s what happened

A recent investigation by TechRadar explores the ongoing issue of 'sycophancy' in AI models, where chatbots like ChatGPT are perceived as being overly agreeable or flattering to users. The author conducted five distinct tests to determine if the AI would mirror opinions, defer to perceived expertise, or abandon factual accuracy to appease the user. While the results showed that ChatGPT occasionally validated the user's perspective or acknowledged their background, it generally resisted outright sycophancy by providing nuanced counterarguments and maintaining factual integrity. The experiment highlights that while modern AI models have been updated to reduce 'glazing'—the tendency to tell users what they want to hear—the behavior remains a complex challenge influenced by user prompts and model settings. Ultimately, the study suggests that while ChatGPT is less relentlessly agreeable than previous versions, users should remain critical of AI responses.
This is a summary. Read the full article at the original source:
TechRadarRelated stories
Deepfakes are wrecking influencers’ credibility, one fake ad at a time
Influencers are increasingly facing a new professional threat as generative AI enables the creation of convincing deepfakes that hijack their likeness…
Your AI agent can plan anything. It still can't click "Post".
Developer Wouter van der Stoep has introduced Ghost Browser, an open-source tool designed to give AI agents the ability to interact with the web like…
AI Just Claimed to Crack the Navier-Stokes Problem. It's Part of a Much Bigger Pattern
OpenAI recently announced that an internal AI model has proposed a solution to the Navier-Stokes existence-and-smoothness problem, one of the seven pr…



