Are you good enough? Who sets the bar?

A recent post on Dev.to explores the psychological and professional challenges of technical interviews, specifically questioning the relevance of manual code reviews. The author argues that these reviews often test memory and specific past experiences rather than genuine problem-solving skills or adaptability. By analyzing the hiring process as a business transaction where companies seek to minimize risk and devalue candidates to lower salary expectations, the author suggests that traditional interview tactics may be outdated. Instead, they propose that evaluating a candidate's ability to deliver business value, leverage modern tools like AI, and demonstrate real-world problem-solving is a more effective measure of potential. The piece concludes by questioning how interview failures impact a candidate's self-worth and salary confidence, highlighting the tension between standardized testing and the evolving nature of software development roles in an era where innovation and ROI are paramount.